Generating user-friendly explanations regarding why an item is recommended has become increasingly common, largely due to advances in language generation technology, which can enhance user trust and facilitate more informed decision-making when using online services. However, existing explainable recommendation systems focus on using small-size language models. It remains uncertain what impact replacing the explanation generator with the recently emerging large language models (LLMs) would have. Can we expect unprecedented results? In this study, we propose LLMXRec, a simple yet effective two-stage explainable recommendation framework aimed at further boosting the explanation quality by employing LLMs. Unlike most existing LLM-based recommendation works, a key characteristic of LLMXRec is its emphasis on the close collaboration between previous recommender models and LLM-based explanation generators. Specifically, by adopting several key fine-tuning techniques, including parameter-efficient instructing tuning and personalized prompt techniques, controllable and fluent explanations can be well generated to achieve the goal of explanation recommendation. Most notably, we provide three different perspectives to evaluate the effectiveness of the explanations. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments over several benchmark recommender models and publicly available datasets. The experimental results not only yield positive results in terms of effectiveness and efficiency but also uncover some previously unknown outcomes. To facilitate further explorations in this area, the full code and detailed original results are open-sourced at https://github.com/GodFire66666/LLM_rec_explanation/.

Minesweeper is a popular spatial-based decision-making game that works with incomplete information. As an exemplary NP-complete problem, it is a major area of research employing various artificial intelligence paradigms. The present work models this game as Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) and Markov Decision Process (MDP). We propose a new method named as dependents from the independent set using deterministic solution search (DSScsp) for the faster enumeration of all solutions of a CSP based Minesweeper game and improve the results by introducing heuristics. Using MDP, we implement machine learning methods on these heuristics. We train the classification model on sparse data with results from CSP formulation. We also propose a new rewarding method for applying a modified deep Q-learning for better accuracy and versatile learning in the Minesweeper game. The overall results have been analyzed for different kinds of Minesweeper games and their accuracies have been recorded. Results from these experiments show that the proposed method of MDP based classification model and deep Q-learning overall is the best methods in terms of accuracy for games with given mine densities.

Competitive board games have provided a rich and diverse testbed for artificial intelligence. This paper contends that collaborative board games pose a different challenge to artificial intelligence as it must balance short-term risk mitigation with long-term winning strategies. Collaborative board games task all players to coordinate their different powers or pool their resources to overcome an escalating challenge posed by the board and a stochastic ruleset. This paper focuses on the exemplary collaborative board game Pandemic and presents a rolling horizon evolutionary algorithm designed specifically for this game. The complex way in which the Pandemic game state changes in a stochastic but predictable way required a number of specially designed forward models, macro-action representations for decision-making, and repair functions for the genetic operations of the evolutionary algorithm. Variants of the algorithm which explore optimistic versus pessimistic game state evaluations, different mutation rates and event horizons are compared against a baseline hierarchical policy agent. Results show that an evolutionary approach via short-horizon rollouts can better account for the future dangers that the board may introduce, and guard against them. Results highlight the types of challenges that collaborative board games pose to artificial intelligence, especially for handling multi-player collaboration interactions.

Academic research in board game playing AI has of course moved While artificial intelligence has been applied to control players' beyond most pedestrian board games, applying a diverse set of decisions in board games for over half a century, little attention algorithms for playing card games with millions of card combinations is given to games with no player competition. Pandemic is an exemplar such as Magic: the Gathering (Wizards of the Coast, 1993) [3], collaborative board game where all players coordinate to games of tactical card placement such as Lords of War (Black Box, overcome challenges posed by events occurring during the game's 2012) [19] and Carcassonne (Hans im Glück, 2000) [9], card games progression. This paper proposes an artificial agent which controls of team-based competition such as Hanabi (Abacusspiele, 2010) [26] all players' actions and balances chances of winning versus risk or Codenames (Czech Games Edition, 2015) [22], and many more. of losing in this highly stochastic environment. The agent applies Traditional board games such as chess [15] and backgammon a Rolling Horizon Evolutionary Algorithm on an abstraction of [23], as well as recent card games such as Race for the Galaxy (Rio the game-state that lowers the branching factor and simulates the Grande, 2007) [6] or digitized board games such as Hearthstone game's stochasticity. Results show that the proposed algorithm (Blizzard, 2014) [11, 18], focus on players competing to deplete another can find winning strategies more consistently in different games player's resources (pawns, hit points) or to accumulate more of varying difficulty.

Humans tend to learn complex abstract concepts faster if examples are presented in a structured manner. For instance, when learning how to play a board game, usually one of the first concepts learned is how the game ends, i.e. the actions that lead to a terminal state (win, lose or draw). The advantage of learning end-games first is that once the actions which lead to a terminal state are understood, it becomes possible to incrementally learn the consequences of actions that are further away from a terminal state - we call this an end-game-first curriculum. Currently the state-of-the-art machine learning player for general board games, AlphaZero by Google DeepMind, does not employ a structured training curriculum; instead learning from the entire game at all times. By employing an end-game-first training curriculum to train an AlphaZero inspired player, we empirically show that the rate of learning of an artificial player can be improved during the early stages of training when compared to a player not using a training curriculum.

This article presents the results of the first edition of the microRTS (μRTS) AI competition, which was hosted by the IEEE Computational Intelligence in Games (CIG) 2017 conference. The goal of the competition is to spur research on AI techniques for real-time strategy (RTS) games. In this first edition, the competition received three submissions, focusing on address- ing problems such as balancing long-term and short-term search, the use of machine learning to learn how to play against certain opponents, and finally, dealing with partial observability in RTS games.

Before i start to write what i'm supposed to, sorry for the bad english, i'm far from being fluent. So, i'm a software engineer student from Brazil and recently i had an idea to apply my machine learning knowledge into a personal project. I thought to myself: "What about applying machine learning algorithms to predict the competitive matches results?" Which features winning teams have in common? Which type of compositions have more win ratio above others?

Real-time strategy (RTS) games pose challenges to AI research on many levels, ranging from selecting targets in unit combat situations, over efficient multi-unit pathfinding, to high-level economic decisions. Due to the complexity of RTS games, writing competitive AI systems for these games requires high speed adaptive algorithms and simplified models of the game world. In this paper we focus on motion prediction and motion planning in StarCraft — a popular RTS game for which a C++ API exists that allows us to write AI systems to play the game. We explore our existing unit motion model of StarCraft and find and fix some inconsistencies to improve the model by accounting for systematic command execution delays and unit acceleration. We then investigate ways to improve existing combat motion planning systems that are based on discrete unit motion sets, and show that search-based algorithms and scripts can benefit from using a new direction set that considers moves towards the closest enemy unit, away from it, and perpendicular to both directions.

Video games are increasingly producing huge datasets available for analysis resulting from players engaging in interactive environments. These datasets enable investigation of individual player behavior at a massive scale, which can lead to reduced production costs and improved player retention. We present an approach for modeling player retention in Madden NFL 11, a commercial football game. Our approach encodes gameplay patterns of specific players as feature vectors and models player retention as a regression problem. By building an accurate model of player retention, we are able to identify which gameplay elements are most influential in maintaining active players. The outcome of our tool is recommendations which will be used to influence the design of future titles in the Madden NFL series.